Saturday, 30 June 2012

TOSHIBA Won’t Build Enterprise Hybrid HDDs



After Seagate acquired Samsung’s HDD division and Western Digital got Hitachi’s HDD business, the HDD market was left with a huge, almost perfect duopoly that manipulated HDD prices in any way the two companies desired.

The only other company that was supposed to play the role of the third HDD “competitor” was the Japanese manufacturer Toshiba.

In fact, it was obvious that a market duopoly was forming right before their eyes; therefore, the authorities conditioned Western Digital’s Hitachi acquisition by requiring the American company to transfer certain assets towards Toshiba.

Numerous uninformed IT amateurs argued that the HDD market was not, in fact, ruled by a duopoly, as besides Seagate and Western Digital, Toshiba was also building and selling HDDs.

The only problem is that Toshiba only makes laptop HDDs, and the desktop HDD market was actually ruled by a perfect, by definition, duopoly.

Well, maybe that wasn’t the only problem. Many would think that, as big a company as Toshiba is, it would likely have a good slice of the laptop HDD market.

They would be wrong, as Toshiba handles less than 9% of the global HDD market. Moreover, that’s a result that includes Fujitsu’s enterprise HDD products, as Fujitsu’s old HDD division is now part of Toshiba.

Ruling 91% of the global HDD market and 100% of the desktop HDD market actually makes Western Digital and Seagate a clear duopoly.

Refusing to see them as such would be like arguing that AMD and Intel don’t form an x86 duopoly because VIA owns less than 1% of the x86 CPU market.

The authorities allowed these to happen and even helped Western Digital and Seagate establish themselves as a duopoly.

Instead of opposing the deal, they required Western Digital to transfer some assets to Toshiba, so that Toshiba could pose as a 3.5” desktop HDD maker.

Indeed, the Japanese company only poses as a 3.5” HDD maker, as it doesn’t manufacture any such drives, and it has already sold its HDD factory in Philippines to Western Digital.

Once Toshiba concluded the sale of said factory to Western Digital, it started bragging about how it would grab a considerable piece of the HDD market in the next period by using Hybrid HDDs.

We find it hard to conquer market share when you’re selling your factories, but Toshiba reaffirmed this intention in a recent interview with xbitlabs.com.

Toshiba’s Joel Hagberg reportedly said :

"Toshiba continuously watches the market and see if a hybrid solution can benefit in the enterprise space. We do see some potential benefit for such a device, however, at this time Toshiba offers SSDs and HDDs for all required tiers in the enterprise segment. We do not see much demand for a hybrid enterprise HDD at this time."

Joel Hagberg is the company’s VP of marketing at the storage division of Toshiba America Electronic Components.

Toshiba seems not to have any desktop Hybrid HDD plans. They acknowledge they won’t make Hybrid HDDs for the enterprise market and now we’re back to Toshiba’s traditional HDD market, 2.5” laptop HDDs.

Unfortunately for us, the users, HDDs won’t revert to the normal pricing of the past years, and Toshiba’s Hybrid Drives won’t paint a rosier picture.

Pioneer Presents DreamBook U12 Tablet/UltraBook



Famous Japanese company Pioneer, maker of high quality audio-video devices has just announced the DreamBook U12 Tablet/UltraBook hybrid mobile system. This is the exact embodiment of ASUS’s well-known and highly appreciated Transformer concept, but it uses a much more powerful x86 architecture.

Readers fearing that Pioneer’s DreamBook weighs more than 1000 grams will be relieved to find out the new hybrid tablet only amounts to a light 890 grams rivaling many other tablets out there.

That’s about 1.96 pounds for the readers used with the imperial system.

Pioneer says DreamBook will come in different configurations powered by Intel’s 3nd Generation Core i3, i5, i7 mobile processors.

The 3D video adapter will unfortunately be Intel’s own HD 4000, but we must accept that it’s much better than having a low performing iGPU like the HD 2500.

The main memory will be configurable up to an 8 GB size and the storage options range between a 32 GB and a 256 GB SSD.

WirelessN and Bluetooth 4.0LE are also present with WCDMA and EVDO as optional features on the side.

There are two cameras on Pioneer’s DreamBook, a 1.3 MP front facing webcam and a 2 MP on the backside.

Connectivity is rich with a micro-SD card reader along with one audio-out jack, one USB 3.0 port and a SIM card slot.

The keyboard assembly comes with a second battery, two extra USB 2.0 ports, one audio jack and an RJ45 LAN connector.

We don’t have any info on the keyboard dock battery, but the Pioneer DreamBook main battery is rated at 4400mAh.

Other options include a NFC adapter, a fingerprint sensor and the undesired hardware-based encryption module TPM.

The pricing is something we didn’t expect from any Japan-made Pioneer device. Considering the performance and features, starting from 1200 USD could make the DreamBook seem somewhat affordable.

That’s would be a starting price of about 965 EUR for the European tablet enthusiasts.

Enterprise MLC SSD Launched with SLC Endurance



Newark based Californian company Smart Storage Systems has just announced a new SSD product line targeted for enterprise use. The new additions use the well-known MLC NAND flash memory, but the company claims impressive endurance rivaling SLC flash.

The smaller the NAND manufacturing process, the lower the endurance of the SSD drives when being rewritten.

Back when NAND was built in 35 nm manufacturing technology, the usual P/E cycle endurance was around 35K. That means that every flash memory cell on the SSD was certified to be written, erased and rewritten again successfully 35,000 times.

Now that most drives are using NAND built in 25 nm technology, most SSDs are only certified for a 5K P/E cycle or even 3K.

Once 1x nm technologies will become available, the endurance is likely to be even harder to ensure.

For enterprise use, such low endurance is not acceptable and usually SLC NAND flash is recommended.

The problem is that SLC flash memory is much more expensive than MLC flash and the costs usually are considerable even for enterprise users.

Many companies are developing special technologies that will make MLC last longer and endure more P/E cycles than the usual 3K or 5K level that’s characteristic for current 25 nm flash.

Most of the technologies used are based on special firmware that improves on the usual wear leveling measures and have special error recovery techniques.

Smart Storage Systems doesn’t give any technical details on the company’s Guardian Technology Platform, but claims that it has now been able to achieve a 50 daily P/E cycle certification for its new Optimus Ultra+ product line.

Taking into account a normal 3-year warranty for an enterprise SSD, a certified endurance of 50 daily P/E cycles amounts to an amazing 54650 P/E cycle certification for the entire warranty period.

The new drives are using Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) interface and are available in capacities ranging from 200 GB to 800 GB.

Performance is rated quite high at 500 MB/s in dual port and 1GB/s in wide port operation with random read/write performance of 100K/60K IOPS.  

Pricing information was not been made available.

Google Nexus Q: Ready for Party Fouls, Not Prime Time [REVIEW]



Google is calling the Nexus Q the “world’s first social media streamer.” When connected to your TV, this $299 ball can be used to stream tunes and videos from your favorite (Gingerbread or higher) Android device.

If you have Android-toting friends over, you can also give them the ability to control the Q and play their own music and videos.

Set to ship in mid-July, the Q is much more expensive than most music and media streaming devices.

And sad to say, it isn’t worth it. The Q is fun to play with, but it also has some significant flaws.

Looking Good

When Google designed the Q, it was looking to create something that you’d want to display on a bookshelf or beside your television for everyone to see rather than keep hidden in a cabinet. While some won’t be thrilled with the orb design, there’s no denying it looks a lot better than your average set-top box.
The matte finish of the Q is beautiful to look at. It’s smooth to the touch and looks every inch a $300 gadget. Recessed ports on the back of the device help you keep cords tidy and out of the way.

LEDs around the center of the Q can be customized for your space with a number of different themes. The lights will pulsate in time with the music, while a cool visualization comes up on your screen. It’s nothing you haven’t seen before, but it’s still nice to look at.

Waving your hand in front of the blue dot on the front of the Q will mute music, and sliding your fingers along the front can turn the volume up or down. The experience is pretty slick, but it’s also not exactly practical.

A pretty ball-shaped device with flashing lights begs to be touched, and likely will be everyone –including small children. During our initial hands-on with the Q, I picked it up and managed to mute the music by accident. Then I accidentally blasted the music so loud I could have broken the speakers, or maybe some eardrums. It’s a party foul in the making.

Getting Started

Setting up the Q is surprisingly simple. The HDMI cable, included, is all you’ll need to get connected to your television. Tech-savvy or not, most anyone should be able to get the device hooked up in just a few minutes.
The remainder of the set-up is done from your Android device using a special Nexus Q app, available at the Play Store or by tapping your phone on the Q to have it sent via NFC.

On-screen prompts within the app guide you through connecting your phone or tablet to the Q via Bluetooth, and inputting information about your Wi-Fi network so the Q knows where to connect. You also identify what room of your home the Q you’re setting up is going to be positioned.

You could have a Q set up with speakers in every room of your home and control all your Qs from the same device. If you don’t have Wi-Fi – or live somewhere where there’s a ton of networks to choose from — the Q can also be connected to the web with an ethernet cable.

Rock and Roll

Once you’ve gotten the Q set up, streaming music and movies is a breeze with your Android device. Tapping a play button at the top of the screen when playing a song will let you select the Q as an output device via whatever you have it connected to. That’s it.
I was able to play some YouTube videos and music on my TV with no issues. Quality looked to be as good as I typically see streaming other content over the web onto my TV, and switching from music to movies and back again worked without much lag. The Q is currently only able to play content from YouTube, Play Music, and Play Movies so you’re also pretty limited in what you can watch.

Party Stopper

The main advantage the Q has right now over its competition is its social feature. In theory you can create playlists with the Q with your friends and give everyone at your party the ability to control what music is playing and shuffle the tracks around.
All that sounds great, but when it comes time to actually trying to use the functionality -– it just doesn’t work.

I first set up my Q using a Galaxy Nexus running Jelly Bean. I tried to join a party with the Nexus 7 tablet also running Jelly Bean, and while the tablet could find the Q, it wouldn’t let me play any content on it.

Trying to access the Q from my Nexus 7 also seemed to lock the device. I can still play music and stream videos from my Galaxy Nexus, but I no longer have access to the settings for the Q.

I ran into similar problems trying to give a friend’s Android device the privilege to spin tunes: it just didn’t work, and produced error messages more often that not.

Both of my devices are afiliated with my Google account, so you would think I would be able to seamlessly connect to the Q. Not so much.

Not Ready For Prime Time

The Q isn’t on sale just yet, and that’s probably a really good thing. In its current form the software is too buggy to make it worth using at all, much less shelling out $300 for.
If you’re looking for something to stream video, there are other options out there that can get the job done for a lot less money. Some of those competing devices also offer more forms of content — Netflix, Hulu, and Spotify — than the Q can currently handle.

A solid software update -– at the very least -– is going to have to happen before the Q can make its way into consumers’ hands. Google has opened the Q up for developers, and will be interesting to see what they are able to create, and whether the Q can ever offer more functionality than its competition.

Community Mods Insist on Authenticity of Half-Life Leaked Alyx Images



A number of volunteer mods on the official forums of Valve have supported the authenticity of the shots.

Smash wrote that, “I know who the source is, but I’m not going to give it away just yet for exclusivity reasons.”

Oscar Sierra added, “Well, tis legit. Awesomes. Hats off to ValveTime.net for the scoop. I wonder will Valve officially comment on these pictures?”

The images were leaked earlier by ValveTime and the fan website also stressed that the images are real and that they would not release them to the public as long as they were not sure.

The shots were taken from an album that has since been taken down and show Alyx in various poses.

It’s not clear whether the images are linked to a possible Episode 3 for Half-Life 2 or to a full-fledged Half-Life 3.

Valve has a policy of not talking about future projects, but the company has promised that, as soon as an internal decision is made, it will talk about the future of the well-known series.

Happy 5th Birthday, iPhone!



No one really thought they’d do it, but when Steve Jobs pulled out that shiny first iPhone on stage at Macworld, on June 29, 2007, everything changed. Not only the smartphone industry, but Apple itself, too.

The iPhone was an instant hit when the device first saw daylight five years ago. It has continued to rack up hundreds of billions in revenue for the Cupertino giant ever since, and there’s no sign of stopping.

In fact, if history is any indication, this year’s iPhone refresh will be another game changer, complete with NFC capabilities, 3D maps, a four-inch display, and a jaw-dropping design.

Today, the iPhone is probably the best-known Apple product. Not bad for its first five years, huh?

Rumor Says Apple Is Launching Thinner iPad 4 This Summer



Chinese sources in touch with Apple’s supply chain have reportedly learned of a thinner iPad with Retina display launching this summer.

While it is highly improbable that Apple will introduce the same iPad with a thinner design only a few months after refresh, effectively spitting every early iPad 3 adopter in the face, the report does bear some credibility.

According to the Chinese-language Apple Daily, cited by DigitTimes, “The upgraded iPad is said to feature indium gallium zinc oxide (IGZO) panel technology to allow the device to feature an even thinner design and longer battery life. Panel supply will be shifted from Samsung to Sharp," the paper reportedly said.

The current IPS (in-plane-switching) displays used in the third-generation iPad require more space and more battery power to light up their three-million-pixel canvas to provide a good viewing experience.

IGZO technology, on the other hand, allows for the same results (if not better), with less power consumption, and less space being used. Considering that this would also allow Apple to include a smaller battery pack, the company would be killing two birds with one stone.

According to the Taiwanese trade publication, Samsung supplies 60-70 percent of current iPad panels, leaving the rest for LG Display and Sharp to deal with.

“But as Foxconn Electronics (Hon Hai Precision Industry) has recently made investments in Sharp, Sharp is expected to see its proportion rise to 50% for the upgraded iPad,” the paper reportedly added, citing its sources.

In other words, Apple has every reason to start mass producing a thinner version of the iPad, as all the hardware requirements are now available in bulk quantities.

As noted above, though, it very unlikely that Apple will cut the life of its third-gen iPad short, leaving millions of customers disappointed that summer brought a thinner and lighter version, with the same price tag, only a few months after the debut of the original Retina-capable tablet.

Samsung GALAXY Note 2 Confirmed to Arrive in September with 5.5-Inch Display



We reported earlier this month that Samsung is currently working on a Galaxy Note sequel, which should be announced and/or released sometime this fall.

According to the first rumors on the unannounced Galaxy Note 2, Samsung plans to put one of its newest Exynos system-on-a-chip (SoC) solution inside this smartphone.

In addition, the device should boast a large 5.5-inch Super AMOLED touchscreen display, which might be of the same quality as Galaxy S III's PenTile screen.

It's been also rumored that Galaxy Note 2 will be equipped with 1.5GB of RAM, but given the fact that some Galaxy S III models are already shipping with 2GB of RAM onboard, this won't make it stand out.

Today, GSMArena claims that the 5.5-inch Super AMOLED capacitive touchscreen display has been confirmed by a trusted source close to the matter.

Moreover, the cited source also claims that the Galaxy Note 2 will come with 2GB of RAM instead of the previously rumored 1.5GB of RAM.

Apparently, the next Galaxy Note device will be a bit narrower than the original model and will feature a Galaxy S III-like form factor and design.

The smartphone will be powered by Samsung's Exynos 5250 chipset with dual-core ARM 15 processor, but this information has yet to be confirmed.

No word on the amount of megapixels of the main camera, but rumor has it that Galaxy Note 2 will boast an 8-megapixel photo snapper on the back with improved sensor.

More importantly, Samsung decided to move the release date of the Galaxy Note 2 to September, though previous rumors claimed the smartphone will arrive in October.

The reason behind the South Korean handset maker's decision seems to be the fact that Apple plans to launch the iPhone 5 in October, so Samsung want to grab as many customers as possible before the Cupertino-based company comes forward with its latest product.

Friday, 29 June 2012

BMW And Toyota To Collaborate On Sports Car Development


At a presentation held today at BMW’s headquarters in Munich, the German automaker together with Toyota announced a further expansion of an original alliance established late last year.

The heads of both automakers signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) aimed at long-term strategic collaboration in four main fields.

They include the joint development of a fuel cell system, collaboration on powertrain electrification, joint research and development on lightweight technologies, and joint development of architecture and components for a future sports vehicle.

No other details were revealed at the announcement but in a statement Toyota CEO Akio Toyoda hinted at the potential of the alliance.

“Toyota is strong in environment-friendly hybrids and fuel cells. On the other hand, I believe BMW’s strength is in developing sports cars. I am excited to think of the cars that will result from this relationship,” he said.

BMW CEO Norbert Reithofer added, “We aim to further strengthen our competitive position in sustainable future technologies. We signed an MoU to this effect today. Toyota and the BMW Group share the same strategic vision of sustainable individual future mobility.”

The new agreement builds on previous deals that include a binding agreement on collaborative research in the field of next-generation lithium-ion battery cells. In addition, BMW and Toyota entered into a contract under which BMW will supply diesel engines for use in Toyota vehicles in Europe from 2014 onwards.

Furthermore, the decision of the two automakers to work more closely on the development of fuel cell technology means that BMW’s previous alliance with General Motors in this field has come to an end. Toyota has promised to launch its first mainstream fuel cell vehicle in 2015 but it’s not clear what plans BMW has. The most likely outcome will see BMW install a fuel cell as a range-extender in its upcoming i electric cars.

As for the joint development of architecture and components for a future sports vehicle, the plans of both automakers remain unclear. It’s been reported that Toyota is keen to launch a spiritual successor to its Supra sports car but with a mid-engine layout, hybrid drivetrain and all-wheel drive configuration. BMW, meanwhile, has long been reported to be considering a new entry-level sports car, which some believe will be called a Z2. However, it hasn’t been revealed whether both automakers will launch a new sports car, like Toyota did with Subaru and their respective GT 86/FR-S and BRZ sports cars, or if only one company will.

What Apple’s New Podcasts App Means For Listeners—And for Apple


Without warning or fanfare, Apple introduced a new Podcasts app this week that gives users of iPhones, iPads, and iPods a much simpler way to find and listen to downloadable audio shows. Pundits had been expecting the move as part of the introduction this fall of iOS 6, the latest version of Apple’s mobile operating system. But for whatever reason, Apple decided to jump the gun.

Podcasts were already available on Apple devices through the Music app as well as numerous third-party apps, so the shift may seem like a small one. But I think the change will turn out to be an important turning point for podcast listeners, podcast creators, and Apple itself, so it’s worth examining the new app in some detail.

What It Means for Listeners

Personally, I’m pretty thrilled about the new app. In fact, I’ve given it a place in my iPhone’s dock, displacing the older Music app. Here’s why. Back in 2010 I decided to take up running, and I’m currently training for the San Francisco Marathon, coming up on July 29. That means I started spending at least six to seven hours on the road every week. Unfortunately, I’m not one of those Zen athletes for whom the act of running is like meditation. If I didn’t have my iPhone strapped to my arm, sending my favorite NPR shows and other podcasts into my earbuds, I’d go out of my gourd with boredom. (You can see my usual podcast playlist in the table here.)

The big hitch in my running routine was that the Music app on the iPhone sucks at podcast management. For the life of me, I could never figure out how to subscribe to a podcast directly from this app. As far as I can tell, it isn’t possible. The desktop version of iTunes allows you to subscribe to podcasts, meaning that the latest episodes get downloaded automatically, but that didn’t help me because I almost never sync my iPhone with my laptop.

The upshot was that before every run, I’d have to spend 15 minutes or more tracking down the latest episodes of my favorite podcasts in the iTunes Store and downloading them manually. It was a total drag, made worse in the last few months by inexplicable slowdowns in the store’s responsiveness. Rendering a simple list of podcast episodes was taking minutes on end. (I posted to Apple’s help forums about the issue but never found a satisfactory explanation. Perhaps the company was fiddling with its distribution system in preparation for the introduction of the new app.)

The new Podcasts app fixes most of that. From the app, you can now quickly search Apple’s catalog of podcasts and subscribe to the ones you like. Once you’re subscribed, there’s a settings page for each podcast that lets you specify whether new episodes should be downloaded to your device automatically, how many episodes should be saved, and so forth. In essence, the new app gives you the same level of control over podcasts on your iPhone that you previously had on your desktop via iTunes.

The app is also pretty fun to use. While it’s yet another example of Apple’s strange new obsession with skeuomorphism, it’s done in a clever way—as you listen to a podcast there’s a spinning reel-to-reel tape machine in the background, with the tape on the left reel gradually winding down as it’s taken up by the right reel. There’s also a cool little toggle for making a podcast play slower or faster.

Critics such as TJ Draper at BuzzingPixel point out that with the new Podcasts app, Apple hasn’t really reduced the confusion for people who manage podcasts across multiple devices. If you subscribe to a podcast from iTunes on the desktop, for example, it doesn’t mean that you’re automatically subscribed on your iPhone; you have to set up subscriptions on each device separately. Also, the seamless syncing of playback between devices that Apple promised in the feature list for Podcasts app doesn’t seem to be working yet. But these problems will only affect people who spend a lot of time listening to podcasts from their computers, which I don’t. And in general, I’m a fan of all changes that further decouple Apple’s mobile devices from the desktop, for reasons I’ll come back to in a moment.

The bottom line: if you listen to a lot of podcasts on your Apple mobile devices, you need to get the new Podcasts app and stop using Music to access your shows. Of course, there are still lots of great third-party apps for listening to podcasts, including Stitcher, Instacast, Podcaster, PRX’s Public Radio Player, and show-specific apps such as the This American Life and NPR: Planet Money apps. But most of these other apps are streaming-only. If you don’t want to eat up huge amounts of 3G data and run down your battery while you’re outside of Wi-Fi range, you need a way to download podcasts and take them with you, which means you need an app like Podcasts that can save files to your device’s media library.

What It Means for Podcast Creators

For better or worse, the evolution of podcasting has always been linked to Apple and its ideas about digital media and mobile software. The very word “podcast” comes from the iPod, the first popular device that could be made to function as a sort of audio mailbox, or a DVR for radio. The first generation of podcast publishing and sharing tools such as Odeo (the thing Ev Williams built before Twitter) basically disappeared after 2005, when Apple first added a podcast directory to the iTunes Store. And it’s still iOS device owners who consume the vast majority of podcast content. So anything Apple does to make it easier for audiences to find and listen to podcasts must be good for podcast producers, right?

Well, yes, mostly. Speaking for myself, I’m likely to consume a lot more podcast content on my iPhone now that it’s so much easier to get it. But there are a couple of wrinkles for podcast creators to worry about. One is that Apple still isn’t allowing podcasters to charge for subscriptions, meaning podcasting will continue to be an LoL activity for most. (That’s for Loss Leader or Labor of Love, take your pick. But definitely not Laugh Out Loud.)

Another worry is the possibility that people might stop listening to podcasts altogether if they can’t find them through the Music app that comes with iOS. (Apple hasn’t evicted podcasts from the Music app quite yet, but this is likely to happen with the release of iOS 6.) Robert Wagner, a Portland, OR-based podcaster, says the disappearance of out-of-the-box support for podcasts in iOS would be “the beginning of the end” for the genre, since many people won’t know about the separate Podcasts app or won’t bother to download it.

But just because the Podcasts app turned up in the App Store this week doesn’t mean that Apple can’t make it one of the standard out-of-the-box apps in iOS 6. And there’s a big plus to the app that should excite podcasters: it plugs a huge hole on the iPad. When Apple came out with iOS 5 in October 2011, it also overhauled the old “iPod” app, replacing it with the Music app. There were (and are) many, many things to dislike about the iPad version of the Music app, and one of them was the way it tucked podcasts away in an obscure category called “More.” (Podcasts later disappeared entirely from the app.) The new Podcasts app brings podcasts back to the iPad; in other words, it’s exactly the sort of “Newsstand for podcasts” app that many Apple observers have been asking for ever since the company screwed up podcasting support with iOS 5. It’s not the beginning of the end; it’s just the end of a very long beginning.

What It Means for Apple

After years of criticism, including quite a bit from me, Apple seems to be getting serious about its iTunes problem. The issue is a simple one: bloat. What started out as a simple music-management program grew, over the course of a decade, into a Hydra-headed monster that handled everything from ripping CDs to activating iPhones and iPads to storing books, apps, TV shows, and movies to toasting bread. The addition of the Ping social network for music fans in 2010 was my personal breaking point—that’s when I wrote a long rant calling iTunes the epitome of cruft and predicting that Apple’s burgeoning digital-media empire would falter unless it ditched the program and started over.

Well, Apple hasn’t killed off iTunes yet. But it’s paving the way, at least on the mobile side, by introducing iCloud (which largely ended the scourge of sync) and assigning the jobs formerly handled by iTunes and the old iPod app to a series of standalone apps. Last year it peeled videos off into a separate Videos app. Then came the iBooks app for managing e-books and the iTunes U app for lecture series, both with their own built-in stores. Now we’ve got a separate Podcasts app as well.

And there’s word that Ping will be retired with the next release of iTunes, which makes sense, since no one used it. I think these moves are more than just housekeeping. As Peter Kafka at AllThingsD puts it, they “may signal an effort to put iTunes on a diet, something many Apple fans have asked for.” That would be a welcome change. It may have made sense to consolidate digital media management tasks in one program back in 2005, when the most powerful multimedia gadget in Apple’s lineup was the video iPod. But it makes no sense today, when iPods, iPhones, and iPads are powerful standalone computers with their own connections to the cloud.

“Given everything the company has riding on iTunes,” I wrote back in 2010, “the idea of rebuilding the program from scratch (or more likely, breaking it into several programs, in order to bring some logic to the media management madness) must seem incredibly risky and ambitious.” It’s good to see Apple gathering up its courage.

Via Xconomy

The inside scoop on the Nexus 7 tablet (Q&A)



Patrick Brady, director of Android partner engineering, has two big launches to celebrate this month. The first is the birth of his daughter three weeks ago. And the second is the launch of his other baby -- the Google Nexus 7 tablet.

At the Goolge I/O developer conference here this week, Google took the wraps off its first ever Google-branded tablet made by Asus. The new 7-inch tablet called the Nexus 7 runs the latest version of the Google Android operating system Android 4.1 Jelly Bean. It's loaded with some impressive specifications, including an HD screen, front-facing camera, and quad core processor. And it's available for the competitive price of $199.

Brady helped lead the team that developed the Nexus 7 tablet. CNET sat down with him here at Google I/O to get some more details about how the Nexus 7 came about and what Google's strategy is for building these Nexus-branded devices. Below is an edited excerpt from our conversation.

Why did Google decide to build a Google-branded tablet?
Brady: We looked at the ecosystem to see what product categories were about to explode next, and we looked at tablets, especially the smaller lower priced tablets. We didn't think this category of tablet was living up to its potential.

We wanted to build something inexpensive, but not cheap. It had to have fast processors and great screen resolution that our developers would want to use it. And we were looking to build a device that could showcase our digital content. We've build the biggest ebook store and we've got movies in Google Play. We've added TV and magazines. So we really wanted the perfect device to consume all of this and thought the 7-inch tablet was a good size.

It was also important for us to make the product light and portable. It's only 340 grams. We wanted people to be able to take it the coffee shop and feel comfortable reading a book or magazine on it. It's roughly the same size and weight as a paperback book. And the reason why paperbacks are the size and weight they are is because they're meant to be portable. You don't want to lug around a big hardcover book.

How long did it take you to pull the product together?
Brady: We started really working on it in January.

Wow, you turned it around pretty fast. I'm surprised you pulled it together in such a short period of time.
Brady: This industry moves fast, so we have to move fast, too. We can't spend a year developing hardware, because when it's done, it has year-old hardware. So we can't really afford to do that.

Who is the target customer for the Nexus 7?
Brady: I think everyone is. We thought a lot about how we'd design the software and hardware to fit a number of use cases. For instance, I think 10-inch tablets are too big for gaming and reading books. We wanted it to be portable. And we wanted it to be great for reading books and magazines as well as playing games and watching movies.

But we also thought it was important to make it powerful enough to do other things with it. That's why we added the quad core processor and we put Google Chrome on it. The Nexus devices are really reference devices so that developers can use them to innovate around the Google platform and ecosystem. So we need to build devices that are cutting edge. We want the best available hardware to test out our content and services.

It was also important to make sure the device was light and portable. And early on we knew we wanted to hit the $199 price point.

That really is an incredible price. How did you get the price tag so low? I heard someone say Google is making no profit on these devices. Is that true?
Brady: I can't comment on the business side of things. But I think in general people misinterpret our motivations for building the Nexus products. It's about building and driving the ecosystem.


Do you think your hardware partners get annoyed that you're building and selling a product with such razor thin profit margins? Doesn't that drive down the retail price of their products and make it harder for them to make money?
Brady: The market pressures are what they are, regardless of what we do. In technology things get smaller and cheaper over time. Sometimes you push envelope and that is what we have done here. But we don't see it as undercutting our partners.

Do you think your hardware partners feel threatened by the fact that Google is partnering with a hardware company and to make and sell its own branded products?
Brady: Back when we first launched the first Nexus One, I think partners were cautious. But then they realized we are not looking to do this completely on our own. We are partnering with companies to build the hardware with us. We have worked with Samsung and HTC on the Nexus handsets. And we've worked closely with Motorola on the Xoom tablet. And now we're working with Asus on the Nexus 7 tablet.

I think our partners now understand that Nexus products are really the intersection between the best hardware and software innovations that are available. That is why we look to partner with companies that are doing innovative things with their own products. And we challenge all our partners that want to work with us on a Nexus product to push the envelope.

We were very impressed with Samsung's curved glass and we've incorporated that into our Nexus handsets. And when Asus came to us and showed us what they could with tablets, we knew right away we wanted to work with them.

I don't think our partners are threatened. In fact, I think they enjoy it. Android is open source, so they understand that by developing these products we're working with silicon vendors to make sure all the technology works with the software. And we're enhancing the software. For example, you can see what we're doing with Project Butter to make the devices super responsive. Everything we develop will ultimately benefit everyone in the Android ecosystem.

I understand that Asus had some great technology you were interested in for the Galaxy 7, but why didn't Google choose Motorola? After all, Google owns Motorola now.
Brady: It was important for us when we acquired Motorola to stress to our partners that we weren't buying Motorola to get in the hardware business and compete directly with them. We acquired Motorola to help the ecosystem in terms of patents and intellectual property.

At first I think our partners weren't sure whether we really meant what we said about not giving Motorola preferential treatment. But they've seen us do another Nexus smartphone with Samsung and the Nexus 7 tablet with Asus, so I think they see that Motorola is not getting preferential treatment. It's all about the ecosystem.

I know the tablet market is still relatively young. But it's pretty clear that the Apple iPad is still outselling any of the Google Android tablets available today. Why haven't the existing crop of Google tablets taken off?
Brady, I think if you rewind things a bit and look at when we launched the G1 people said a lot of the same things. It wasn't outselling the iPhone, and they seemed disappointed. I think it takes a little while for sales to kick in. And it depends on the product. There are so many choices in terms of tablets. There are different sizes. Some are Wi-Fi only some have cellular connectivity. There is a wide range of price points.

But I also think there was some content missing early on. Now we're rounding that out with TV shows and magazines on Google Play, so there's a lot more to do with your tablet. I think the Nexus 7 is the best tablet that's available today. Still one size doesn't fit all. So I expect to see people buying all kinds of tablets, in all different sizes.

If you had to offer advice to someone deciding between a Kindle Fire and the Nexus 7, I'm sure you'd recommend the Nexus 7. But what features specifically do you think make it a winner over the Kindle Fire?
Brady: I'm not going to compare one device against the other. But I can tell you why I think the Nexus 7 is great. First, it's thin and light. It only weighs 340 grams. You probably don't realize how heavy some of these tablets can be.

The HD display on the Nexus 7 is also important. You may not appreciate the difference if you're watching standard-definition content. But when you do, watch HD content you'll know the difference.
Quad core processors are also important. You can see how Chrome works better and how the games are more responsive.

I'm also a big fan of the front-facing camera. It's great for Google+ hangouts. I don't think people will be jumping out of blimps and landing on the Moscone Center everyday while hanging out in Google +. But there are other good reasons to have the front facing camera.

My wife and I just had our first child a few weeks ago, and my parents live on the East coast. I didn't bring my laptop with me to the hospital, but I brought my Nexus 7. I took it into the recovery room with me, and we were able to introduce my family in Boston, Seattle and New York to my daughter. So I was glad we decided to do the front-facing camera.

Via CNET

Chrome for iOS: What you should know



Google has just launched Chrome for iOS, the long-awaited browser replacement we've all been hoping for, just a day after Chrome for Android came out of beta.While iOS still does not offer the ability to set your own default mail client or web browser, Chrome lets you take your tabs, bookmarks, saved passwords, and settings with you. The only bummer is that while Google claims that "you can enjoy the same speedy and simple Chrome experience across your devices," Apple's rules about third party browsers ultimately cripple it. John Herrman summed it up well, for BuzzFeed :

But other apps that want to include a browser function, be they Facebook or an actual alternative browser like Chrome, don't get Nitro. For security reasons, the browser developers get to use in their apps is a variant of an older, pre-Nitro version, called UIWebView. It's fine — it renders pages with the same fidelity as Mobile Safari. But it is slower. Noticeably slower.

In our tests, Chrome wasn't much slower than Mobile Safari — especially on iPhone — but if you're the kind of person that's going to notice a slowdown, you might be a bit peeved while browsing JavaScript-heavy sites. The first thing you'll notice while using the app is that tabs are on top of the URL bar on iPad, unlike in Mobile Safari. If you're on iPhone, tabs arrange themselves into neat rows that include each page's site title, as well as an image from the page. You can swipe these tabs off the screen to exit them. On iPhone, you can also use the innovative "edge swipe" Chrome invented on Android (or did Meego invent it?) to thumb between open tabs. A menu button in the top right corner drops down a quick settings menu where you can find bookmarks, "find in page," and a button to take you to a deeper Settings menu.

Tap in the URL bar to instantly search or input a URL — like in Mountain Lion (and perhaps iOS 6, when it launches), Chrome's "omnibox" functions as both a search and URL bar. And whether you open pages on Chrome for iPhone, iPad, Mac, Android, or Windows, all of your history and tabs stay synced. You do sometimes have to tap Refresh to force a sync, but the implementation works incredibly well. Another nice addition is a convenient "request desktop site" in the Settings drop-down if you get fed a mobile webview. Speaking of Settings, you'll find everything you need in the app's Settings menu. There's no bottom navigation bar for new tabs or sharing or bookmarks, but you still end up with just as much space for browsing onscreen because iOS' URL bar disappears as you browse, in contrast.

At the end of the day, Chrome power users on desktop are going to want to use Chrome for iOS. The app syncs history, bookmarks, and even tabs effortlessly. Unlike most apps Google has released for iOS, Chrome is filled with plenty of nice touches that illustrate how much effort was put into it. If the app ever crashes, you even get a "restore tabs" prompt, just like on desktop. There's Incognito mode (via a nice toggle on iPad) if you want to browse privately. A little shortcuts keyboard appears above the normal keyboard as you type in URLs. Edge swipe on iPhone generally works great, and could very easily become a UX idea other developers work off of. I think it's time to start begging for "the next big thing" from the big G.

RIM delays BlackBerry 10 OS, posts Q1 losses



Did you hear that? I wonder if you heard the same thing I did. It's the sound of thousands of anguished BlackBerry supporters gnashing their teeth and are throwing their old BB handsets at the wall. Instead of being able to upgrade to the new BlackBerry 10 devices this year, they will have to wait till Q1 2013.

This is on top of a first-quarter loss of US$518 million, with a revenue of US$2.8 billion. While this may sound like it's not a bad thing--companies sometimes do make losses, they can recover by the end of the fiscal year--RIM is actually down 33 percent from the same quarter last year where it posted US$4.2 billion in revenue. It has also led to the company letting go 5,000 workers by the end of its fiscal year.

While RIM remains strong in Asia (it's particularly popular in Indonesia), that's may not be sufficient for the company--it's been reported that most Indonesian customers just want a phone that lets them access Facebook and WhatsApp. It doesn't matter if it's a BlackBerry device or a budget Android smartphone--Indonesian customers will get it as long as it's cheap.

That's not really a good sign since any smartphone worth its salt will be able to do just that.

RIM's CEO Thorsten Heins has stated in the RIM earnings call that the company will not be switching to Android.

"We're not trying to be one of many," he said. "We are trying to be different. If I continue to rely on someone else's OS and someone else's platform, would that allow me in the long run to really differentiate?"

Given that 2012 will see a new iPhone, more Windows Phone 8 products and new Android handsets featuring Ice Cream Sandwich or Jelly Bean, consumers are spoilt for choice for their next smartphones. Chances are that by the time the first quarter of next year rolls around, RIM may already be irrelevant.

Via CNET

RIM shares plunge: 'It's a matter of survival now'


RIM plunges
Shares of Research In Motion Ltd. are plunging in pre-market action this morning in the wake of the company's brutal first-quarter results and the decision to delay its crucial new BlackBerry 10.

RIM stock is down by about 17 per cent in pre-market moves on Nasdaq as the BlackBerry maker's stunning fall from grace continues amid heated competition from the likes of Apple Inc.'s popular iPhone and devices running Google Inc.'s Android system.

Analysts, who began slicing their price targets on the stock after the report, believe we haven't seen the end of the troubles for what was once Canada's great technology hope, the company that gave the world the smartphone. They expect more job cuts, and a sale or break-up of the company if chief executive officer Thorsten Heins can't turn it around quickly.

RIM unveiled an ugly set of numbers late yesterday, a loss of $518-million (U.S.), or 99 cents a share, and an operating loss of $643-million. Revenue sank almost 44 per cent from year-earlier levels to $2.8-billion, and shipments of BlackBerry devices fell to 7.8 million, while the number of subscribers rose to about 78 million.

Most importantly, RIM again delayed its new generation of BlackBerry devices, on which its future is pinned, with Mr. Heins saying he would "not compromise the product by delivering it before it is ready" and expressing confidence in the smartphone when it gets to market. It's now expected early next year, but Apple and other manufacturers, such as Samsung, won't be standing still.

RIM also announced that it's slashing 5,000 jobs, and that its cash levels are up to $2.2-billion.

"Layoffs are not free - there's a use of cash with that," analyst Shaw Wu of Sterne Agee in San Francisco warned in an interview with Reuters. "They have to be very careful with their cash balance. It's a matter of survival now."

Analysts are particularly bleak.

Kris Thompson of National Bank Financial said "it's not too hard" now to see RIM broken up with a value of about $8 a share.

"First it was the chip, now RIM can't handle all the code," Mr. Thompson said of the delay of the new device.

"The story keeps changing; we're not buying it. RIM is a hardware vendor, not a software vendor. While more is often better, not so much in software code!"

He expects RIM to cut deeper, saying its current levels can support a global market share, while it will be "lucky" to capture 5 per cent.

He also noted the decline in revenue from its service operation.

"We've been warning investors that this cash cow is running out of milk," he said in a research note.

"We believe this was the last quarter of subscriber growth. International consumers are going to wake up soon to avoid BB7 handsets."

Mr. Heins said he was not satisfied with the results - no surprise there, he knew what the market reaction would be - and that h is working "aggressively" in all areas of the company.

Here's a sampling of what other analysts think:

"It is becoming clearer than ever that the company needs to wave goodbye to hardware and focus more on delivering services and licensing software. This quarter’s results have effectively confirmed that RIM can no longer afford to be a wholly vertical company with a fully integrated business model. From now on, any under-performance by the devices part of the organization would mean a significant churn of current BlackBerry users, which could lead to the collapse of the whole business including services.  RIM is gambling on the launch of its forthcoming BlackBerry 10 operating system to redress the situation. However, the ongoing delay in launching the platform is not going to be in the favor of the company given its current bad performance." Malik Saadi, Informa Telecoms  and Media

"We had expected BB10 to finally launch in October but integration issues with RIM's NOC/node infrastructure continue to plague the company. Our checks had indicated that the recoding of the infrastructure so that it would be compatible had been completed but apparently issues have arisen in its interface with BB10. We think execution risks will continue as RIM plans to lay off 5,000 of its 16,500 employees by February while at the same time launching its most pivotal product in the company's history." Peter Misek, Jefferies

"It’s like watching a puppy die. It’s terrible," Matthew Thornton, Avian Securities, to Reuters

"Wow, what a disaster ...  From a numbers point of view, it could hardly be worse, and it’s going to deteriorate from here." Edward Snyder, Charter Equity Research, to Bloomberg

"The delay increases the likelihood of a sale. Even if BB10 launched in the fall against iPhone 5, it would be very, very tough to get consumers to try it out." Michael Walkley, CanaccordGenuity, to Bloomberg



Markets climb on Europe deal
Global markets are rallying today after a deal among EU leaders aimed at easing the crisis in the euro zone.

"With expectations about as depressed as they possibly could be, the agreement that emerged from the euro zone leaders’ summit in the early hours of the morning was a substantial positive surprise," said Adam Cole of RBC in London.

Tokyo's Nikkei climbed 1.5 per cent, and Hong Kong's Hang Seng 2.2 per cent. In Europe, the focus of attention, London's FTSE 100, Germany's DAX and the Paris CAC 40 were up by between 1.4 per cent and 2.6 per cent by about 7:45 a.m. ET. Dow Jones industrial average and S&P 500 futures also rose.

"Just when you’re about to lose all faith in Europe’s leaders, they finally make some progress," said Benjamin Reitzes of BMO Nesbitt Burns.

"Markets are rallying following the EU announcement," he added in a research note.

"The euro jumped more than 1 per cent, moving as high as $1.2628 from about $1.2450. The major currencies are up almost across the board, with only the yen trading about flat. As such, the U.S. dollar index is getting hammered, off about 1 per cent, which if sustained would be the biggest loss since November. Spanish and Italian yields are down sharply, with the latter’s 10-year off 26 basis points to 5.93 per cent ... Commodity prices are higher: WTI crude is up 3.2 per cent to $80.15, Brent crude is up 2.5 per cent to $93.65, gold is up $26 at $1579, base metals are stronger (Comex copper is up 2.4 per cent), while the grains are higher as well."

RIM prospects dire after launch delay: analysts



Research In Motion Ltd could run out of cash and ultimately fail, even with the launch of its now-delayed BlackBerry 10 device early next year, Wall Street analysts said.

At least 10 brokerages cut their price targets on the stock, some by as much as 50 percent, a day after the company reported worse-than expected quarterly results and said it would delay the launch of its next-generation device to early 2013 from late this year.

RIM shares were down 16 percent in pre-market trading on the Nasdaq.

"If RIM continues to be run as it is, we believe that the company will eventually fail," Nomura Equity Research said.

"We do not expect RIM to successfully drive a turnaround of its financials, even with the launch of BB10 next year," the brokerage said in a note to clients, adding that its model assumes that RIM disappears by 2020 in a gradual decline.

BlackBerry 10, considered to be RIM's make-or-break product, was originally slated to be launched in the first quarter and the delay has already contributed to a 40 percent drop in the company's stock price so far this year.

"Given RIM's cash burn, BB10 can't come soon enough," Barclays said in a note to clients.

Analysts at Citi Investment Research and Jefferies slashed their price targets on the stock to $5.00 for RIM's U.S.-listed shares, a fall of 45 percent from Thursday's close.

"We believe fundamentals continue to get worse and RIMM could run out of cash and need to raise capital within two years implying that as time rolls forward, if we are correct, the value of RIMM continues to go lower," the Citi analysts said.

"We expect more write-offs and impairments to RIMM assets and we question if RIMM's new BB10 products will even matter as it may be too little too late," the analysts said, adding that they expected the company's smartphone sales growth to be less than half of the industry average in 2012.

MARCHING OFF THE CLIFF

RIM said it would lay off 5,000 workers, about 30 percent of its workforce, as it tries to save cash, although some analysts noted that this would come at a short-term cost.

Citi said it believed the company should be hiring instead of firing to get its products out on time. "With the distraction of this large layoff, it will be difficult to retain and motivate employees to develop new products."

With a weak product portfolio and the BlackBerry 10 delay, RIM faces continued volume pressure as well declining average selling prices, said Credit Suisse, which cut its price target on the company's U.S.-listed shares to $7 from $11.

"While the stock remains cheap, only the potential for an outright sale of the company or a break-up keeps us at a "neutral" (rating)," the brokerage said.

RIM's board is under increasing pressure to consider unpalatable options such as selling its network business or forming an alliance with Microsoft Corp, three sources familiar with the situation said on Thursday.

Cannacord Genuity said it did not believe the launch of BlackBerry 10 would turn around RIM, which has come up short in competing with Apple Inc's iPhone and other devices using Google Inc's Android software. "...We believe RIM will need to sell the company," Cannacord said.

However, Baird Equity Research, under the heading "Marching off the cliff", said it believed there was no likely buyer.

CIBC cut its rating on RIM to "sector underperformer" from "sector outperformer." National Bank Financial, however, raised its rating to "sector perform" from "underperform", saying it was time to get off short positions.

RIM said on Thursday it lost $192 million, or 37 cents per share, for the first quarter ended June 2. Revenue declined 43 percent to $2.81 billion.

The company's shares, which have dropped about 70 percent over the past year, were trading at $7.55 in pre-market trading. The stock closed at $9.46 in Toronto on Thursday.

Via Reuters

Thursday, 28 June 2012

Android apps to run on Apple Macs via Bluestacks program



Owners of Android smartphones now have a way to run their favourite apps on an Apple Mac computer.

Start-up Bluestacks has produced a software wrapper that lets the phone apps run on a desktop Apple machine.

The release follows an earlier software tool that helped Android apps make the jump from a phone to a Windows PC.

Bluestacks said the software was for people that wanted a consistent experience with their favourite apps, no matter where they used them.

Playing games
So far, only 17 Android developers, including Handy Games, Creative Mobile and Pulse, have signed up to make their apps available to run on a Mac.

Bluestacks said more developers were signing up to get their apps working with the company's software.

The latest estimates suggest there are about 400,000 Android apps available.

In a statement, Bluestacks head Rosen Sharma said its software was helping to "break open" the closed ecosystem surrounding Apple's computers.

Making apps that looked good on desktops could also help developers produce programs that worked well on tablets, he said.

Stuart Miles, founder and head of technology news website Pocket-lint, said the Bluestacks software would likely prove popular with keen users of Android apps.

"The appeal is likely to be more for gamers," he said. "So your favourite Android game, you could have that on your desktop at work."

It might fill another gap, he said, because there was currently no easy way to run apps for the iPhone on a Mac desktop computer.

In addition, it might also mean that people can get hold of free versions of iOS apps by going to an Android site, downloading it and running it on a Mac. If more developers sign up it could mean they can get popular programs, such as Angry Birds, for free instead of buying them from Apple's Mac store.

A test, or alpha, version of the Bluestacks Mac software is now available for download on the company's website.

Via BBC

California court bars sale of Samsung tablet in U.S.



A federal court in California has issued an injunction against the sale of Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 in the U.S.

U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh issued the relief sought by Apple Inc. on Tuesday evening citing that the Samsung product likely infringes on the iPad maker’s patent related to the design of the tablet PC.

The ban is effective upon Apple’s posting of a $2.6 million bond meant to compensate Samsung if the court later finds the injunction unnecessary. The hearing of the patent infringement case begins on July 30.

Koh’s order came after a federal appeals court heard Apple’s appeal on the judge’s earlier refusal to grant the injunction against the tablet and Samsung smartphones.

Samsung said it will appeal Koh’s decision.

The ban does not cover a new edition of the Samsung product, the Galaxy Tab 10.1 II.

Apple is accusing Samsung of copying the design and look of its iPad. While the iPad’s share of the global tablet market is 63 percent in the first quarter of this year, the counterpart product from Samsung is also gaining in sales making the Korean firm the main competitor of the American company.

The two companies are also locked in patent infringement disputes in other countries.

Google Glass Designer Gives Us An Up Close Look



"We don't want to put something in front of you that will distract you," Google's Isabelle Olsson says as she looks at me through what many would consider to be a peculiar pair of glasses.

But, of course, I'm distracted. Not only is she wearing a pair of glasses with a camera and transparent cube above her eye but those glasses are the Google Glasses. And I've wanted to see the Google Glasses since they were previewed a few months ago, and Google showed off its vision of the future: A future where it can overlay digital information right in front of your eyes.

Olsson is the senior industrial designer on the Google Glass project and has spent the last year working at Google's X Lab to design a piece of technology that will sit in front of people's eyes. The glasses, according to Google's video, will be able to do everything from search the Internet and show you maps right in front of your eyes.

"We have been working to make these wearable. They won't be done until we have removed everything we can possibly remove," she says.

The glasses surely aren't done, Olsson and every other Google exec has made that very clear here at the Google I/O conference. But the prototype is one of the most interesting gadgets I've ever seen.

They are about the same weight as my pair of Ray Ban sunglasses. (Olsson wouldn't let me put them on, but I was able to feel them and take a look at the buttons.) And it's hard to believe that in the spectacles lives a tiny computer. She explains that they have taken the parts of a smartphone -- the processor, battery, etc. -- and put it in the left leg (or right depending on which way you view them) of the glasses.

On the front of the glasses, in the top left (or right depending on which way you view them) corner is a small camera and a small glass-looking box, which is a tiny display. On the top of the glasses is a power button and a camera button. You control the screen's interface with the touchpad on the leg of the glasses.

"The touchpad is all hidden. There's no texture, it extends all over," Olsson describes. She explains that when she adjusts it sometimes it looks like she is deep in thought.

Olsson's glasses weren't powered on, but she explained to me that she typically takes pictures with the camera and then uploads them using the WiFi or Bluetooth in the glasses. You can connect the glasses to a phone via Bluetooth and use the phone's 3G or 4G connection. Olsson and the others wearing the glasses at the conference wouldn't discuss battery life.

Olsson also wouldn't discuss what the display looked like from the other side -- the interface and what it looks like overlaid in the real world. However, she did come back to that distraction point and emphasized that her and her team made sure to put the display above the eye. "We placed the display above the eye not in front of it; I want this to be immersive, but not distracting."

And that makes two of us. By the conversation's end, I'm no longer distracted by the peculiar glasses. I'm just dying to see what is on the other side of the lens.

Apple opens iTunes store to more Asian countries



Apple rolled out its iTunes online store to Hong Kong, Taiwan and 10 other Asian countries Wednesday in a broad push to sell music and video to more users in the company’s fastest growing region.

Singapore, Macau, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, Sri Lanka, Vietnam, Brunei, Cambodia and Laos will also get their own iTunes stores. But China, which accounts for a big part of Apple’s revenues, was not included.

Previously, Apple fans in these territories could only access the company’s App Store, a separate platform used to download applications for their iPods, iPhones and iPads.

The only way they could access music or movies from the iTunes store was by using gift cards sold in some of the 51 countries such as the United States or Britain that already had their own stores.

Now they can use locally issued credit cards to download music from the store’s 20-million-song library as well as buy or rent movies.

Until now in Asia and the South Pacific, only Australia, New Zealand and Japan had their own iTunes stores.

The Asia-Pacific region is becoming increasingly important to Apple’s profit growth. Sales in the region, which excludes Japan, rose 174 percent in 2011 to $14.3 billion, outpacing the Cupertino, Calif.-based company’s other major markets including the Americas and Europe.

Via Boston

Samsung's Galaxy S III smartphone is a genuine iPhone challenger


The new Samsung Galaxy S III smartphone is a genuine iPhone challenger. A couple of days with it is plenty to find clues why Apple has pursued Samsung so aggressively over patent-infringement claims — and this week won a court order blocking U.S. sales of the S III's cousin, Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet.

Despite Apple's complaints about "copycat products," the Galaxy S III is rolling out largely as planned. All four national carriers have announced versions of the sleek, slim phone, which runs on the latest version of Google's Android operating system and boasts a screen with about 70 percent more real estate than Apple's iPhone 4S.

T-Mobile has already begun selling the S III, offering a 16-gigabyte version — that I tested — for $280 with a two-year contract, after a $50 mail-in rebate. Sprint's S III is due to arrive in stores Sunday, with a 16-gig version selling for $200 with a contract. AT&T has begun shipping preorders but hasn't set a date for in-store sales, and Verizon's is expected in stores by mid-July. With a contract, each will sell for $200.

So what can S III users expect? In short, an innovative and powerful smartphone well-designed as a computer-on-the-go, which is exactly how much of its target market is likely to use it.

In the five years since Apple essentially created a new market, the smartphone has become far more than a phone with computer skills. For the more than three in 10 people who own the devices, a smartphone is now their primary on-ramp to the Internet, according to a Pew Research Center study published Tuesday. And the fraction is even larger among groups such as young adults.

Apple's success is partly due to its seamless integration of hardware and software. With the iPhone as well as Mac computers, the operating system is built and continually upgraded by the same company that makes the devices — or at least designs them, while outsourcing their manufacture to China.

With Android, Google designed an open-source operating system offered to any manufacturer, and each then marries the software with its hardware. Though Apple has, by many measures, managed to repeatedly renew its lead — and may do so again this fall with the expected release of the iPhone 5 — Samsung and other Android makers have given admirable chase.

If you haven't looked at an Android lately, the S III is a good place to start. Running Google's Android 4.0 platform, nicknamed "Ice Cream Sandwich" by Google's snack-happy developers, it's the new flagship of the smartphone fleet at T-Mobile, the last national carrier without an iPhone. Here are some of its more impressive features: Performance. With 2 gigabytes of random-access memory and a 1.5 gigahertz dual-core processor, Qualcomm's Snapdragon S4, the Galaxy S III delivers your data swiftly, with no evidence of lag — a noticeable upgrade even from the Nexus S, an earlier Android 4.0 phone from Samsung, according to a colleague who owns one.

Worth noting is that T-Mobile's S III claims swift speeds — with average downloads topping 10 megabits per second — even though it runs on the carrier's HSPA+42 network, a step below the vaunted LTE networks that other U.S. carriers are already rolling out. T-Mobile says its LTE service is coming next year. Video. With a crisp, 4.8-inch diagonal screen, HD video is prominent in the S III's pitch. Though its pixel density, even with its 1,280-by-720 display, lags behind the smaller-screened iPhone's 960-by-640-pixel "Retina display," the S III delivers bright, well-saturated colors. It's far from tablet-size, but to many the extra screen area will hold great appeal.

The S III also features a picture-in-picture option called "Pop Up Play." You can continue watching videos while e-mailing, texting, or otherwise multitasking. "Intuitive interaction." The S III includes "S Voice," an interactive voice controller that takes simple commands — not just placing phone calls, but playing a song, sending a text, or even taking a photo with the S III's 8-megapixel camera. Network errors prevented me from putting it through all its paces, but Samsung says it performs popular Siri-like functions as well, such as answering trivia questions, initiating navigation, or setting alarms. For now all I can say is: S Voice, alert me when you've fixed the problem.

Other intelligent features save power or effort. With its user-facing camera, the S III can tell when you're not looking at it, and dim the display. Want to call someone when texting has produced one of those classic miscommunications that not even an "LOL" can cure? Just lift the phone to your ear and it dials automatically — before the person can respond with an angry emoticon. Bottom line. The Android platform sometimes seems reminiscent of Windows programs that are chock-full of features but suffer from their overcomplexity — unless you happen to value highly specialized features or gewgaws, such as the S III's ability to share photos in real time with fellow S III owners at, say, a concert or sports event.

The key is whether it gets the basics right, and on that the S III acquits itself well. Androids may lack the elegance of Apple's unified ecosystem, but Apple has sacrificed some of that itself by opening its platform to outside app developers. On the S III, handling apps and widgets is a snap. So is managing e-mail, contacts, calendars, and other essential smartphone functions.

Apple's patent claims may be totally righteous — the court case will tell. Meanwhile, Samsung is giving it a run for its money.

Via Philly

Google goes up against Amazon, Apple with Nexus tablet



Google Inc will sell its first tablet from mid-July for $199, hoping to replicate its smartphone success in a hotly contested market now dominated by Amazon.com Inc's Kindle Fire and Apple Inc's iPad.

By taking a greater role in the tablet market, Google hopes to ensure that its various online services remain front-and-center to consumers amid a changing technology landscape in which tablets by Apple and Amazon are increasingly becoming gateways to the Web and Web-based content such as movies and music.

Google's (GOOG.O) maiden entry in the tablet market, which will also see the advent of Microsoft Corp's (MSFT.O) Surface this year, could also help accelerate development of tablet-specific applications for its Android operating software -- a key factor that has helped popularize Apple's iPad, analysts say.

The "Nexus 7" tablet, built by and co-branded with Taiwan's Asus (2357.TW), was one of several gadgets unveiled at its annual developers' conference on Wednesday, as the Internet search and advertising leader dips its toe into the intensively competitive consumer arena.

The announcement of the new tablet comes a month after Google acquired its own hardware-making capabilities with the $12.5 billion acquisition of smartphone maker Motorola Mobility. But Motorola, which Google has said it will run as a separate business, was absent from most the new products and services showcased at the event.

Google co-founder Sergey Brin demonstrated Google Glass, a futuristic-looking eye-glass-computer that can live-stream events, record, and perform computing tasks. The device will be available to U.S.-based developers early next year for $1,500.

And it unveiled the Nexus Q - a $300 device with a built-in amplifier that lets users stream content from Android devices onto their TVs.

But the Nexus tablet hogged the spotlight. Sold initially only on the Google Play online store, its $199 price tag and 7-inch stature is aimed squarely at the Fire, but the Nexus has a front-facing camera while Amazon's (AMZN.O) tablet does not.

Analysts consider the Fire a window into Amazon.com's trove of online content rather than an iPad rival, given the $499 that Apple (AAPL.O) asks for a device with a "retina" display that far outstrips it in terms of resolution.

Google can similarly use the Nexus 7 to connect to its own online offerings, which include YouTube and Google Play, the name of its online store where it sells digital music, movies and games. It will go after more cost-conscious users who might shun the pricier iPad.

"Nexus 7 is an ideal device for reading books. The form factor and weight are just right," said Chris Yerga, Google director of engineering for Android.

Google said it will offer buyers of the Nexus 7 a $25 credit to spend at the Google Play store and it showed off several media-centric capabilities, such as a new magazine reading app.

"They all but called it a Kindle Fire killer. They're clearly gunning for that No. 2 spot behind Apple's iPad that is currently occupied by Kindle," said Altimeter Group analyst Chris Silva. "But the con is they do not yet have a footprint in people's minds and wallets as the go-to place to purchase and consume media."

JELLY BEANS

Google has partnered with smartphone makers to develop Nexus-banded smartphones for several years, providing a showcase product that delivers Google's ideal vision for a device based on its Android software.

Extending the Nexus concept to tablets should similarly establish a model that other hardware makers can emulate, resulting in a more a competitive and uniform line of Android tablets to market, say analysts.

Shares in Google gained 0.8 percent to $569.37 in afternoon trade.

The Nexus will feature the new 4.1 "Jelly Bean" version of Google's software, as well as a front-facing camera, a 1280x800 resolution screen, and an Nvidia (NVDA.O) Tegra 3 processor.

Google's free Android software is the No. 1 operating system for smartphones, with about 1 million Android devices getting activated every day

But it has struggled to compete with Apple's iPad in the market for tablets, largely because it lags far behind Apple and Amazon in terms of available content and tablet-specific applications, such as games.

Meanwhile, Apple has increasingly moved to reduce its dependency on Google services on its devices. Earlier this month it unveiled its own mapping software, which will replace Google maps as the default mapping service in the next version of its mobile operating system.

And Amazon's Kindle Fire, while based on Google's open-source Android software, features a customized interface that does not use many Google services.

Executives showcased the new 4.1 "Jelly Bean" version of Android operating system on Wednesday. The new software delivers faster performance, according to the company, and new features such as "voice search."

"That range of services will be the secret to stitching together this rag-tag fleet of Android gadgets into a platform that can compete with Apple for minutes of users' attention rather than premium device dollars," said Forrester analyst James McQuivey.

The tablet's limited availability - executives said they had no plans yet to expand distribution beyond Google's own site - may curtail initial sales growth.

Google briefly sold a specially designed Android smartphone - the Nexus One - directly to consumers in 2010, but closed the online store after four months saying it had not lived up to expectations.

But it's the lack of "native" applications - software designed with a larger tablet in mind, rather than ported from smartphones - that is the Nexus' biggest impediment for now.

"Unless you have a strong app offering, for a consumer it is a piece of glass that does what a phone does on a larger screen," Carolina Milanesi, analyst at Gartner Research

Via Reuters

Google Nexus 7, Nexus Q aim to take on rivals


You'll have to stay tuned for my hands-on reviews of the Google Nexus 7 tablet, as well as the black, dome-shaped Google Nexus Q media streaming player announced with some fanfare at the Google I/O developer conference in San Francisco today. But with the brand-new hardware, Google has redrawn the battle lines in the hotly contested mobile and media entertainment spaces.

When it comes to tablets, Google's goes up against the usual suspects, Apple's iPad, of course, but perhaps more directly Amazon's Kindle Fire and Barnes & Noble's Nook Color — given Nexus 7's $199 entry price and screen size. The Nexus 7 will run on Google's next-up Android mobile operating system, known as Jelly Bean.

The Fire and the Color rely on some flavor of Android, though you'd never know it. And Google will also be competing with some of the smaller Android-based Galaxy tablets sold by Samsung and others. In that respect, Google's situation is similar to what Microsoft will be doing with the new Windows 8 tablets that were previewed last week. Both companies will be walking a tightrope by competing against the very companies that make devices that run on their software.

MORE: Google unveils Nexus 7 tablet, Nexus Q media player

Meanwhile, the 2-pound Nexus Q player would seem to be Google's answer to Apple TV, though at $299 it costs a lot more than the $99 Apple charges for its diminutive set-top box. Both devices allow you to play movies, videos and music from the cloud through your television.

Google bills Nexus Q as "the first social streaming media player" because anyone in the room can use their Android phone or tablet to contribute content and control what's playing, so long as they're tapping into the Internet, wirelessly or through Ethernet. Indeed, all the content you're playing — songs, HD movies, TV shows and YouTube videos — resides in the cloud. You'll need an HDTV, compatible speakers or audio-visual gear to take advantage of the device. It ships in two to three weeks.

By going with Asus as the maker of Nexus 7, Google, for now anyway, isn't giving most-favored-nation status to its recent acquisition of Motorola Mobility.

Nexus 7 houses a powerful Tegra 3 quad-core processor, a 7-inch touch display (1280x800) protected by Corning's Gorilla Glass, and battery life that Google claims can deliver nine hours when you're playing high-definition video, and a couple of hours more if you're Web surfing or reading e-books. It's thin, weighs nearly 12 ounces and has a front-facing 1.2-megapixel camera and micro USB port. Among its features will be the ability to access Google Maps offline. You can also use the so-called NFC technology on board for such services as Android Beam.

You can get the tablet for $199 or $249, depending on whether you go with 8 gigabytes or 16 GB of internal storage. The price includes $25 of credit that you can spend on the more than 600,000 apps and games in the Google Play store, or on music, movies, TV shows, e-books and now magazines. You'll also get a digital copy of the Transformers: Dark of the Moon movie gratis for the tablet, among other free content. And though Nexus 7 will ship in mid-July, Google has begun accepting pre-orders at the Google Play website.

Forrester analyst James McQuivey says, "Learning a lesson from Amazon, Google can see that the only way to beat the premium-worthy iPad is to go for the millions of customers who are ready for smaller and cheaper tablets and then grow those customers into more Android-powered devices and, more importantly, Google-powered services like Google Play and whatever paid video experience You Tube will likely create."